With the , this study selected one or two categories for the Chengdu Shishi secondary school and Jinniu secondary school correspondingly, distributed 3 hundred forms, retrieved 278 questionnaires, deducted a dozen invalid surveys and you can 266 good forms. The fresh specialized study try completed of .

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the sports leisure attitude scale with 16 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.87, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001), and three common factors could be extracted, and the corresponding Cronbach' ? coefficients were 0.84, 0.81, and 0.83 respectively. In addition, the overall scale ? coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.92, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.91, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, with good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three common factors (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the scale has good reliability and validity.

Canonical relationship investigation is actually a mathematical method familiar with sample the new relationship studies between you to definitely group of control parameters plus one classification from criterion details

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure motivation scale with 21 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.78, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 4 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.79–0.85, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.88; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.04 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the four dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure barriers scale with 17 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.85, Bartlett ball test p < 0.001). The scale could extract three common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.82–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.94, 0.90, 0.91, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.02 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure satisfaction scale with 25 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.82, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 6 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach’ ? coefficient is between 0.81–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.84; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.93, 0.95, and 0.92 in order, which was all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the six dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Mathematical Statistics

They will find the maximum correlation amongst the linear combination of control details as well as the linear mix of expectations variables. Therefore, canonical relationship study examination brand new canonical correlation mixture of multiple expectations parameters and you can several handle variables, Canonical correlation investigation can create a variety of high and unimportant canonical relationship. Fundamentally, it will provide the pursuing the very first suggestions: you’re an average correlation coefficient is also echo the correlation studies within linear mix of handle parameters additionally the linear integration of practical details. The common relationship coefficient have to reach a serious top in order to portray the important relationship among them groups of linear combos. The second reason is the newest wisdom coefficient (we.age., the brand new rectangular value of typical relationship coefficient R). This means the normal circumstances of basic adjustable can Alt.com help also be become informed me by typical items of your manage changeable (no less than 10%). The 3rd is the architectural coefficient (regular load). It’s meant to manage new relationship between your adjustable and you may this new standard variable to their particular regular linear combos. The absolute property value the new coefficient need to be more 0.31 to spell it out you to definitely the particular regular linear combos enjoys explanatory energy.